Go to main contentsGo to main menu
Wednesday, September 9, 2026 at 6:33 PM

MC COMMISSION PASSES ORDINANCES

MC COMMISSION PASSES ORDINANCES

The Marshall County Commission met Tuesday morning. The board approved second readings of three ordinances.
•    Ordinance 69: Establishes a $150 penalty for failing to report a controlled burn, unless a court appearance is required, and outlines conditions under which a burn ban is enacted.
•    Ordinance 70: Repeals Ordinance 5, which pertained to poor relief. Those services are now governed by the state welfare manual.
•    Ordinance 71: Repeals Ordinance 20 related to ag land classification requirements, which are now covered under state law.

In other agenda items, Larissa Heitmann gave the quarterly Extension update. The commission also met with the department head for budget planning purposes. 

Addressing planning and zoning matters, the board approved a drainage request from Colby Olson in Dayton Township and a plat for Erickson’s 2nd Subdivision in Hickman Township. Building permits were approved for Wyatt Janisch in McKinley Township, SMJ International/John Knapek (Verizon Wireless) in Sisseton Township, Mark and Emily Hrabik in Lake Township (with a variance), and Buffalo Lake Ranch Inc./Tyler Hellwig in Buffalo Township.

Planning and Zoning Director, Erin Collins-Miles, noted updates to a portion of property around Buffalo Lake, where homes are being readdressed using GPS coordinates for more accurate location data. Notifications about the changes have already been sent to affected residents.

 The next commission meeting is July 22. 


Share
Rate

Poll: END OR RETAIN EXPANDED MEDICAID COVERAGE? South Dakota voters will decide in November on a proposed constitutional amendment that would end the state’s expanded Medicaid coverage if the federal government’s share of funding for the expansion falls below 90%. The expansion, approved by voters in 2022, provides Medicaid eligibility to certain adults ages 19 to 64 with incomes up to the federal limit established by the constitutional amendment. The proposed amendment would remove that expanded coverage if the federal funding level drops below 90%. If the election were held today, how would you vote?
READ OUR E-EDITION